The large majority of Canadians are opposed to horse slaughter, yet it’s still a thriving industry in Canada. Here’s why it’s more important than ever to take a stand against this deplorable practice.
Three steps forward, two steps back
Fortunately, thanks to the initiatives of individuals and organizations such as the Canadian Horse Defence Coalition to raise awareness for the Canadian horse slaughter industry, small strides are being made. Since 2016, the amount of horse meat exported by Canada has decreased from 10.3 million kg in 2016 to 5.3 million kg in 2018. Revenue from horse meat exports decreased from $76 million in 2016 to $31 million in 2018. The number of horses slaughtered in Canada also dropped from 113, 334 in 2008 (when the US defunded meat inspectors at horse slaughter plants) to 54,100 in 2016. However, as of 2017, the Canadian government refuses to release horse slaughter statistics citing privacy concerns as one family, Bouvry, owns the remaining two slaughter plants in Canada.
Poor traceability makes horse meat dangerous for human consumption
Horse slaughter isn’t just antiquated and cruel – the meat that’s produced is also dangerous for human consumption. Canadian horse meat is exported mainly to Japan, Belgium and other overseas countries, but it’s also consumed in Canada. Unfortunately, horses are the only large animals slaughtered at Canadian plants with extremely low traceability. Several inquiries to the Canadian Meat Council regarding how much horse meat is consumed in Canada reveals that they do not keep track, whereas statistics on how much beef is consumed are readily available.
Not only is traceability low in terms of where the meat is sold in Canada, but so is the tracking of medications administered to horses. While traceability policies and practices for beef, dairy, and sheep are improving, traceability in the Canadian horse meat industry remains problematic as horse owners routinely administer drugs such as phenylbutazone (Bute), and dewormers marked with the strict warning ‘not to be administer to animals for slaughter.’
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) insists it tests horsemeat for chemical residues but admits to testing only .5% of horsemeat since 2010. While every horse sold at slaughter must have a completed Equine Identification Document (EID) in which the owner attests that the horse has been drug-free for a minimum of six months, Global News reports that kill buyers admit that the document can easily be tampered with. Furthermore, a recent ATI reveals that the CFIA and auditors have documented horses at Bouvry’s with incomplete EID’s. A CFIA inspection report reads:
The information in EID documents is based purely on the horse owner’s declarations. The CFIA verification of authenticity of declarations on the EID documents, as provided in the CFIA’s National Equine Identification and Traceability Program and related CBS tasks, does not constitute a strong government control.
Treatment of slaughter horses is deplorable
In 2019 investigators from the Animal Welfare Foundation (AWF), Animals’ Angels, and Tierschutzbund Zurich (TSB) documented conditions at three Bouvry-owned feedlots, one in Montana, and two in Alberta. The Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Equines requires that horses in feedlots receive adequate shelter, veterinary and hoof care – but these are clearly lacking in the Bouvry feedlots, where horses are lame and unable to rise from recumbent positions. A recent Access to Information request by the Canadian Horse Defence Coalition revealed that the CFIA has routinely documented filthy and empty water troughs at Bouvry’s slaughter plant in holding areas.
Canada’s horse meat industry is in a deplorable state in which human health may be at risk due to poor traceability and horses suffer from CFIA documented inadequacies at feedlots and slaughter establishments. For more information, please visit: defendhorsescanada.org.
Source: Equine Wellness
The treatment of horses transported overseas for slaughter and human consumption is at the heart of a two-day Federal Court trial which kicked off in Vancouver Wednesday. The Canadian Horse Defence Coalition claims the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) is not following rules that require horses to be segregated and given ample head room during long-haul overseas flight to Japan.
The coalition is seeking a judicial review of the agency's pre-flight inspection practices along with an order that would compel the CFIA to comply with the Health of Animals Regulations in approving horse transport.
"To the best of my knowledge, this is the first time that an animal protection organization has challenged the Canadian federal government over the transportation of animals in Canada," coalition lawyer Rebeka Breder said in her opening statement. "This case, in my submission, can have significant implications on future government decisions and the CFIA specifically, where their ongoing practice or policy is in direct contravention to existing law."
Compatibility of animals in question
The coalition filed the suit last year, claiming the inspection agency is following the guidelines of an interim policy introduced in 2017, instead of the sections of the Health of Animals Regulations which govern the transport of horses.
CFIA inspector-veterinarians have to ensure that all legal requirements are met before the horses can be shipped off to Asia. But Breder says the agency is side-stepping the regulations by claiming horses don't need to be segregated if they are "compatible" animals and that a horse's head or ears can touch the cargo netting above its head during air transport.
In its defence, the CFIA rejects the coalition's allegations. The agency also claims that new rules set to kick in next year make the case "moot." "The CFIA's role, on the facts of this case, is to determine whether the horses are healthy for export and are being safely transported," the agency said in a filing with the court. "There is no requirement on the CFIA to obtain a particular enforcement result, and it is well recognized that perfection in enforcement can never be more than an unattainable goal.
No agency above the law
Breder said the animals in question are mostly large Belgian draft horses, and they require room. "We're not talking about little ponies," she said. "We're talking about big strong animals." She also claimed that while draft horses may appear compatible with each other before being shipped overseas, they may become incompatible under the stress of a long flight.
The Canadian Horse Defence Coalition is dedicated to banning the slaughter of horses for human consumption in Canada and the export of live horses for the same purpose. But Breder said their aim in the Federal Court case is limited to ensuring that the horses are transported humanely.
"No government agency is above the law," coalition executive director Sinnika Crosland said outside the courtroom. Crosland said her group doesn't want to see horses "crammed" into crates. "If they're going to ship them, they should put them singly in a crate," she said. "What they would need to do is make the crates high enough so the horses' heads aren't touching the ceiling, so they can comfortably raise their heads and not bang their heads or their ears up against the ceiling."
Source: CBC News
The federal government is trying to quash a lawsuit launched by animal welfare advocates who want to end the export of Canadian horses for slaughter and human consumption in Japan and South Korea.
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) is defending its equine transportation and enforcement policies against claims that it's failing to meet legal obligations to ensure humane and safe shipments. In its June 17 court filing, the CFIA also said that revised regulations set to kick in next year make the case "moot."
The Canadian Horse Defence Coalition (CHDC), the group behind the legal challenge, insists the new rules slated for February 2020 could put horses on long-haul overseas flights to Asia at even greater risk. CHDC lawyer Rebeka Breder said the conditions the horses experience during transport cause distress and danger. Large, flighty animals are often crammed together without the adequate headroom required by law, the group claims.
"They're exhibiting signs of stress. There have also been injuries, there have been deaths over the last several years," Breder told CBC News. "Generally speaking, the shipments are not safe for horses. We know that for a fact."
Canada exports thousands of horses each year to Japan, a market where some consumers enjoy the meat as a raw delicacy. In 2018, Canada also began shipping live horses to South Korea. In its recent court filing, CFIA said the lawsuit is based on "cultural norms" and CHDC's interpretation of what is, and is not, an appropriate food animal.
"However, the inevitable reality is that the CFIA's role, on the facts of this case, is to determine whether the horses are healthy for export and are being safely transported," the filing said. "There is no requirement on the CFIA to obtain a particular enforcement result and it is well recognized that perfection in enforcement can never be more than an unattainable goal."
The rules for shipping horses:
The existing Health of Animals Regulations say larger horses must be segregated from each other and set minimum requirements for headroom clearance. The CHDC lawsuit said the CFIA is not always in compliance with the regulations. New 2020 rules will eliminate the segregation requirement, with a stated goal of giving shippers greater flexibility so that compatible horses can travel together with less anxiety. Maureen Harper, a retired veterinarian who worked for CFIA for 30 years, said "compatibility" is difficult for an inspector to assess at the airport.
Larger, stronger horses should be segregated to avoid injuries from kicking, biting, toppling or trampling, she said. Horses also need space to maintain their balance in transit, especially during take-off or landing. Harper said the public knows little about Canada's horse export and slaughter industry and she believes most Canadians see horses as companions like dogs and cats — not as food.
"Everybody that I speak to, they're just totally horrified when I tell them what's happening and I think the CFIA has a huge role to play here and unfortunately, in my view, they've dropped the ball," she said.
Horse welfare 'top priority':
Eliot Bouvry of Alberta-based Bouvry Exports — which produces horse meat for export, among other products — said the welfare of horses and other livestock is a "top priority" for his company and the CFIA. Horses are inspected by CFIA vets at the airport before departure for cuts, bruises, limps or sickness. Animals are transported on single-deck trailers that have been sanitized and layered with fresh shavings according to Canada's livestock transport regulations, he said.
"Other species/livestock are transported long distances for slaughter and it's not a topic of discussion," he said in a statement to CBC News. "Although activists keep the industry accountable, we do not consider it truthful that it is an animal welfare issue. For (some) people it is an ethical problem, which is another debate."
Business vs. animal welfare?:
Breder accuses the CFIA is putting business interests ahead of animal welfare. "There's a lot of money at stake, and it's quite clear to the CHDC that what is really at issue here are industry interests, not the interest and the welfare of animals and the way that they're transported," she said. "It is simply the bottom line to make as much profit as possible."
The CFIA rejects the claim that industry sales are driving policy and enforcement, and maintains that all animals, including horses, are "properly certified, fit to travel and transported humanely in a way that does not cause injury or undue suffering." The agency said new rules will strengthen safety regulations for horse transport.
Online petition calls on Minister MacAulay to stop the exporting of live horses for slaughter "The updated regulations establish clear and science-informed requirements and thus better reflect the needs of animals and improve overall animal welfare in Canada," CFIA said in a statement.
Last year, 3,871 horses worth $26.5 million were shipped to Japan. Exports were fewer in number than during the previous year, but had a significantly higher value. Canada also ships fresh, chilled and frozen horse meat to Japan worth about $29 million annually, and millions of dollars more to European countries, including France and Switzerland.
While it's considered a food taboo in most parts of North America, horse meat is sold and served in some grocery stores and restaurants in Canada.
Source: CBC News
Thousands of American horses are live-exported to Canada each year just to be slaughtered for human consumption. The Safeguard American Food Exports (SAFE) Act would make this illegal.
Draft horses wait their turn at the New Holland Auction, a link in the food chain that the European Union is trying to better control. While new regulations restrict horses treated with drugs like bute from entering the food chain, enforcement is complicated and weak.
There is a profitable, but declining, market for horsemeat in Europe, and much of the horsemeat consumed there comes from Canada and the United States. US and Canadian horses enter the food chain by way of the Canadian abattoirs. It used to be a simple transaction. Horses sold at auctions in Pennsylvania and elsewhere in the US were transported to Canada and sold to the meat processors. But all that changed when the European Union initiated a program to ensure the integrity of the food system.
In trying to bring order to the sprawling food safety program adopted by the EU, legislators created thousands of regulations. The regulations are intended to ensure the overarching goal of food safety “from farm to fork.” Thus the most mundane aspects of food—listing of ingredients—to the profoundly complicated—complete veterinary histories for all animals in the food chain—are bound together in what has proved to be an enforcement nightmare. It’s not that anyone opposes food safety. But recent events have revealed that even the most well-intentioned laws can be drowned by conflicting priorities, greed, bureaucratic stumbling, and outright subversion.
To comply with EU regulations, Canadian authorities require all horses imported for slaughter to have a passport, called an Equine Information Document (EID). The EID, which is supposed to be completed by the owner of the horse, includes a veterinary history. What could possibly go wrong with that? Plenty, it seems.
For one thing, the EU regulations stipulate that certain drugs are so toxic that any horse treated with them is banned forever from the food chain. One of those drugs is Phenylbutazone, commonly known as Bute—and commonly given to horses to treat an array of problems. In addition, horses sold at Pennsylvania’s auctions are not always brought to the auction by their owners. The veterinary histories of many of these horses are not comprehensive. The person hauling the horses to Canada—the kill buyer—is the one who usually is responsible for verifying the details of the EID. Recently a random test of horsemeat exported to Europe from Canada was found to contain traces of Bute. This discovery precipitated several events, including a one-day shutdown of the equine pipeline from the US to Canada last year.
Canada’s Star Newspaper investigated the way EIDs are validated, and found that the documents are often rife with errors and incomplete. The investigation concluded that horses that should be excluded from the food system can easily slip through because of lax oversight of the EIDs at the abattoirs.
EU authorities’ enforcement of regulations regarding import of horsemeat from Canada had been somewhat relaxed, and a promised deadline of July 2013 for more rigorous enforcement of rules passed quietly. But it did not go unnoticed.
According to the EU Press and Media Office, efforts to close the gaps that resulted in the contaminated horsemeat entering the food chain are a priority. “The EU is currently reviewing an action plan provided by the Canadian authorities on official oversight negotiated with the US regarding equine to be exported to Canada for slaughter,” the press office explained. “The action plan particularly has to address weaknesses earlier spotted by the Commission Inspection service on the identification and registration” of horses coming from the US.
How Effective is the System?
Alex Atamanenko, a Member of Parliament from British Columbia, has proposed legislation that would ban the import of horses for slaughter. He is concerned about tainted horsemeat, and about the integrity of the EID system currently monitored by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). He has questioned the CFIA about Bute, and about how EIDs are verified at Canadian abattoirs. “According to the CFIA regulations,” he says, “any time an animal is given Bute even once in its lifetime, it’s banned from the food system.” He believes that at least 80 per cent of horses have received Bute at least once. “They (CFIA) said they check for this in muscle tissue, whereas in fact there has been research [in the US] that has shown that it’s the kidneys that need to be checked.”
Regardless of the methods used to detect banned substances, though, Atamanenko says that “ultimately the CFIA is responsible for any meat that goes into the food chain. Unfortunately what’s happening in agricultural sectors is that more and more power is given to industry to self-regulate. The government is stepping back.”
As for the veracity of the EIDs, he is not convinced that the system is foolproof. “An ID can be falsified,” he says. And although there are supposedly mechanisms in place prevent it, “it’s happening, so obviously the system isn’t picking it up.”
Atamanenko provided a transcript of a 2011 hearing at which he questioned the CFIA about how the inspection system worked to determine whether an individual horse was deemed acceptable for the food chain. “All equine owners intending to sell animals directly or indirectly to Canadian meat processors provide an EID which reports all vaccines, medications or any occurrence of illness within six months of slaughter.” CFIA representatives further noted that “each EID is verified by the plant operator and systematically reviewed by a CFIA veterinarian.”
Covert Horsemeat Arrives with the Lasagna
Early this year food inspectors in Europe discovered traces of horsemeat in packages of meat labeled ground beef. Soon horsemeat was found in everything from meatballs to lasagna, and a full blown scandal erupted. It became apparent that widespread fraud had resulted in the mislabeling of numerous products containing what was supposed to be beef. The extent of the fraud, along with the perpetrators, is still unclear. But, in the 11 months since the scandal began, major food wholesalers, supermarkets and even Burger King have been forced to withdraw products as inspectors unearthed more and more products containing horsemeat.
The EU system of labeling all processed foods with comprehensive lists of ingredients as well as countries of origin seemed to be unraveling by the day. In February, less than a month after the first whiff of this scandal was noticed, the Member States of the EU endorsed a plan proposed by Health and Consumer Policy Commissioner Tonio Borg. The plan included EU-wide testing of meat products, to determine the scope of the fraud. In addition to seeking to identify beef products contaminated with horsemeat, the plan called for testing samples of horsemeat for traces of Bute.
Commissioner Borg’s office did not return several requests for comment.
A Conflagration of Compromises
If it were an automobile, the mammoth food system overseen by EU commissioners would, on its own, be an epically complicated vehicle to drive safely. Think about an owner’s manual written in many different languages, and a list of operating instructions with more topics than Wikipedia. Then check out the safety features that are, in many cases, apparently unexamined.
The food safety system was constructed on a framework in which traceability was one of the key features. Consumers were guaranteed that the beef they purchased at the butcher or the supermarket could be traced back to the farm where the cow was born. They believed that there was a complete veterinary history for every animal that entered the food chain, and that any animal slaughtered for food would never have been treated with certain drugs, including Bute, Clenbuterol and other pharmaceuticals that are commonly used on horses.
Alex Atamanenko said that the Canadian government was stepping back, and permitting more and more industries to “self-regulate.” The Star reported that Canada’s meat processing industry exports $90 million worth of horsemeat to the EU annually. In that context, how is the integrity of the border between self-interest and self-regulation maintained? Can the guarantee of traceability be reliable if the EIDs are not?
The EU is working with Canadian and US officials to come up with policies that will achieve the goals of the traceability program, and ensure the EU promise of food safety from farm to fork. It’s unclear when those new policies will take effect and how they will affect the equine industry in the US. And it’s not clear yet whether Atamanenko’s proposed law banning the import of horses for slaughter will gain any support. What is clear, though, is that the EU is now stumbling through a crisis of confidence brought about by an inspection system that promised more than it could deliver. Once they recover their balance, it’s possible the Commissioners will take a more aggressive approach to traceability.
Source: Pennsylvania Equestrian by Suzanne Bush