Horses For Life
  • Home
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • WILD HORSES
  • Horse Slaughter
    • Horse Slaughter Facts
    • History of Horse Slaughter
    • Why Ban Horse Slaughter?
    • Horse Slaughter Videos
  • ACTION ALERTS
  • NEWS | BLOG

Grazing Bill Eases Permitting Process for Public Lands Ranchers

12/21/2014

 
Wyoming public lands grazers could see shorter permitting times after Congress passed a bill seeking to streamline grazing permit renewals. The Grazing Improvement Act, approved last week, allows the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service to speed the renewal of the agency's 10-year grazing permits.
wyoming livestock
"It really at a fundamental level provides some stability for the grazing industry by assuring that our permits will be renewed in a timely fashion," said Jim Magagna, executive director of the Wyoming Stock Growers Association.

The legislation allows agencies to approve permits in the face of environmental lawsuits against permit renewals. U.S. Bureau of Land Management officials reported a permitting backlog of more than 5,600 permits nationwide in September. At the time, Congress was required to renew these permits annually.

"The agencies didn't have the resources to meet that requirement, (which) basically put people in a position where they couldn't get their permits renewed in a timely manner," Magagna said. "In some cases, they couldn't graze their livestock for extended periods of time."

Under current law, permitting is subject to environmental analysis prior to renewal of a permit. The new legislation allows federal agencies to approve permits without requiring environmental analysis. Agency range managers will still conduct environmental reviews at their discretion. Magagna said the new law focuses range management on the health of allotments.

"Environmental analysis has been tied to permit renewal, and really that analysis isn't about the permit. It's about the actual range condition," he said. Sen. John Barrasso, the author of the bill, said it will provide added protections for Wyoming ranchers seeking consistency in their operations.

"For too long, our ranching families have been the target of anti-grazing litigation that puts their grazing permits in jeopardy,” Barrasso said.

The legislation passed as part of the National Defense Authorization Act.

Source: Billings Gazette, by Trevor Graff



State of Wyoming Files Lawsuit Against Feds to Force BLM to Manage Wild HorsesĀ 

12/8/2014

 
This new Wyoming lawsuit is a waste of public tax dollars amounting to nothing but a display of chest-pounding bravado to appease ranchers and energy extraction capitalists. This positioning is also a show of allegiance and support for the fringe political initiative to have states take over the management of public lands. It should be duly noted that after BLM's September 2014 round up in Wyoming, the entire population of horses in the state is now only about 2,000 horses! ~ Horses For Life

Wyoming Wild Horses
CHEYENNE, Wyo.- Today, the State of Wyoming filed suit against the United States Department of the Interior and the United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) over the federal government's failure to appropriately manage wild horses in Wyoming.  Wyoming announced its intent to sue in August.

“The lawsuit asks the court to force the BLM to manage wild horses in Wyoming as required by the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act,” Governor Mead said. “It is my belief, and the belief of other western governors, that the BLM does not have the resources to manage wild horses effectively.  By filing suit it sends a message that wild horse management is a priority and the BLM must be provided the funding necessary to manage them.”

The Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act requires the BLM to manage wild horses below previously set appropriate levels and to remove excess horses when populations exceed those levels. Herds will continue to exponentially grow beyond what the BLM determined is ecologically appropriate for each herd management area (HMA). These herds have population growth rates that range from as low as 25% to as high as 58% each year. Horses often stray from HMAs onto state and private land.

“Excess wild horses in Wyoming can harm the habitats used by other wildlife species, including sage-grouse, antelope, deer and elk,” Governor Mead said. “Overgrazing caused by overpopulation threatens all animals including horses.”

- View Wyoming's December 8, 2014 Petition for Review.  Additional documents, including correspondence with the BLM, can be found on
the Attorney General's website at: http://ag.wyo.gov/current-issues.

Source: Wyoming Governor Press Release

September 16th, 2014

9/16/2014

 
Agency Sage Grouse Review Puts Thumb on Scale to Magnify Wild Horse and Burro Effects
The method used by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to assess range conditions is seriously skewed toward minimizing impacts from domestic livestock and magnifying those from wild horses and burros, according to an appraisal by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). As a result, the BLM’s approach to range management targets scattered wild horses and burros while ignoring far more numerous cattle. The agency’s assessment is part of a 2013 report on factors influencing conservation of the Greater Sage-Grouse, a ground-dwelling bird whose numbers have declined as much as 90% across the West and which is under consideration for protection under the Endangered Species Act. That report concludes that twice the area of sage grouse habitat is negatively impacted by wild horses and burros than the area negatively impacted by livestock. A PEER appraisal of the methodology found:

  • BLM calculates the “area of influence” of wild horses and burros on sage grouse habitat based merely on their presence within Herd Management Areas in sage grouse habitat, while it considers livestock impact to have occurred only when livestock grazing allotments fail the agency’s Land Health Status (LHS) standard for wildlife;
  • If the agency used the same approach for calculating the area of influence of livestock within BLM grazing allotments on sage grouse habitat as it did for wild horses and burros, the area of influence for livestock would be roughly 14 times that given in the report and more than six times that of wild horses and burros; and
  • Within BLM’s own grazing allotment LHS database records, livestock grazing is cited as a cause of failure to achieve a land health standard 30 times more often than are wild horses and burros.

“At BLM apparently not all hooves are created equal,” said PEER’s Advocacy Director Kirsten Stade, noting that the LHS evaluations cover more than 20,000 grazing allotments and examine whether a grazing allotment meets the agency’s standards for rangeland health with respect to several vegetation and habitat conditions. “This helps explain why wild horses are regularly removed from the range but livestock numbers are rarely reduced.”

The BLM assessment influences not only the agency’s range management decisions but also will figure into the Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision on whether to list the sage grouse under the Endangered Species Act.

Last year in response to a complaint by PEER filed under agency Scientific Integrity policy, BLM claimed that it does not have enough “reliable data” about commercial livestock impacts to include them in current assessments of environmental conditions on Western range lands. Yet, BLM has more data on the grazing that it authorizes through permits than virtually every other topic.

“When it comes to cattle, BLM plays with a marked deck,” Stade added, pointing out the PEER analysis that will become part of PEER’s new grazing reform web center set to launch in several weeks. “We are posting BLM’s own data in a way that allows apples-to-apples comparisons while displaying satellite imagery that depicts the true livestock landscape impacts.”
Compare BLM claims to what their data reveal
Livestock Wild Horses Burros
The relative negative influence area of feral ungulates with respect to domestic livestock based on BLM’s spatial analysis approach (USGS OFR 2013-1098) are completely at odds with BLM’s own land health standards (LHS) evaluation causal data, used to inform BLM’s analysis. BLM concludes in OFR 2013-1098 that the negative area of influence of feral ungulates is twice that of domestic livestock, when the records show that only 3% of grazing-related failures of standards are attributed to wild horses and burros.

Click Here to See the PEER Analysis
Click Here to Read the 2013 BLM/USGS report
Click Here to Revisit BLM claim of unreliable livestock grazing data


Source: PEER (Protecting Employees who Protect the Environment)

Q & A: Livestock grazing on public lands

5/20/2014

 
Livestock grazing has been a part of the western landscape of the United States since settlers arrived. The first recorded livestock policy, according to the U.S. Forest Service, was published in 1905 when the agency was created by Congress. Further and more defined regulation of livestock grazing came in 1934 via the Taylor Grazing Act.

Who sells grazing permits?
Most grazing permits are handled by the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Permits can also be sold on private and state lands, including lands owned by the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA).
Land managers determine the amount of available forage in an area and then sell what they determine are an appropriate number of permits.

What do permits cost?  
Ranchers are often frustrated when critics of the grazing program use one number — $1.35 — to argue it’s cheap to run cattle on federal lands. That number is the beginning point for the formula that dictates the actual bill.

The $1.35 fee is applied to an "Animal Unit Month" or AUM — the approximate amount of forage a 1,000-pound cow with a calf will eat in one month. Ranchers are charged based on the number of AUMs they use and how many months they use them. For instance, if a rancher has 1,000 AUMs and runs cattle on federal lands for four months, the fee is $5,400.
Picture
Longer-term grazing permit holders are expected to make and maintain improvements on the land, primarily water developments and fencing. Those not using fencing, particularly those running sheep, are expected to patrol their herds and keep them on the proper allotment. Moving the animals from summer to winter range is costly, and livestock lost to predators can reduce potential profits.

Randy Parker, chief executive office of the Utah Farm Bureau, says the $1.35 figure is a "misnomer."

"There are many additional costs. Some years [ranchers] might be in good shape and other years they get beat up pretty good," Parker said. "They are hard working, they love the land and they love to work the crops or livestock. They also do a lot to help the land and the wildlife they share it with." Environmental groups argue grazing damages ecosystems and endangers other species, and have called for restrictions and increased fees.

A 2005 Government Accountability Office report found that the BLM and the Forest Service would have to charge an AUM fee several times higher than the $1.35 to recover their expenditures. The Obama administration rejected a proposed overhaul in 2011, the New York Times reported. More recently, advocates for wild horses have argued grazing livestock, not an overpopulation of wild horses, are more damaging to the drought-stricken western range, contending the horses are being unfairly used as a scapegoat.

Are all grazing permits based on the $1.35 fee?   
SITLA is charging $4.78 per AUM for certain areas and $8.32 per AUM on select allotments. So the same rancher with 1,000 AUMs would pay $19,120 for four months.

Terry Padilla, Intermountain Region range director for the U.S. Forest Service out of Ogden, said current private AUM fees run between $11 and $12. The current $1.35 federal grazing fee, according to the BLM, is applied to federal lands managed by the BLM and Forest Service in 16 western states.

The fee is adjusted each year using a formula involving private grazing land rates, cattle prices and the cost of livestock production. The grazing fee drops when the prices are low and increases when appropriate. It can’t drop below $1.35, due to a 1986 executive order.

Is grazing on public lands increasing? 
The BLM reports there has been a gradual decrease in livestock grazing over the years. "Grazing use on public lands has declined from 18.2 million AUMs in 1954 to 7.9 million AUMs in 2013," according to a BLM fact sheet.

Parker said Utah’s numbers for livestock on public lands have also declined since the 1940s, when 5.5 million AUMs were allocated. In 2012, Parker said, that number was about 1.3 million.

Source: Salt Lake Tribune, by Brett Prettyman


    RSS Feed

    Picture

    Author

    Horses For Life Foundation is dedicated to ending the slaughter of American horses, preserving and protecting the wild horses and burros on public lands, and ending horse abuse and neglect through Advocacy, Public Education, and Policy Reform.

    Tweets by @_HorsesForLife

    Archives

    May 2015
    April 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    June 2011

    Picture
    >>> View Current ACTION ALERTS

    Categories

    All
    1971 Free Roaming Wild Horse And Burro Act
    AAEP
    Action Alert
    Ag Gag
    Agriculture Appropriations
    Agriculture-appropriations
    Aldf
    American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign
    Animal Abuse
    Animal-abuse
    Animal Cruelty
    Animal-cruelty
    Animal Law
    Animal-law
    Animal Legal Defense Fund
    Animal-protection-of-new-mexico
    Animal Welfare Act
    Animal Welfare Institute
    Appropriations Committee
    Appropriations-committee
    Aspca
    Assateague
    AUM
    Beef-belt-llc
    Ben Shelly
    Ben-shelly
    Bible-spring-complex
    Big Lick
    Big-lick
    Bill Richardson
    Bill-richardson
    Blair Dunn
    Blair-dunn
    Blm
    Boyd Spratling
    Brian Sandoval
    Bruce Wagman
    Bruce-wagman
    Bureau Of Land Management
    Burros
    Canada
    Cfia
    Chevaline
    Chris Stewart
    Cloud Foundation
    Corolla Wild Horses
    Corolla-wild-horses-protection-act
    D'Allende Meats
    Dan-erdel
    David Rains
    David-rains
    Deerwood Ranch
    Disaster Planning
    Donkey
    Dorian-ayache
    Double D Ranch
    Eco Sanctuary
    Ed Whitfield
    Ed-whitfield
    Emergency Evacuations
    Endangered Species Act
    Epa
    Equine Information Document
    European Commission
    Farm Bill
    Fda
    Feral Horses
    Fertility Control
    Fish And Wildlife Service
    Fmia
    Food Safety
    Food-safety
    Forest Service
    Foundation To Protect New Mexico Wildlife
    Foundation-to-protect-new-mexico-wildlife
    Frank Guinta
    Front Range Equine Rescue
    Front-range-equine-rescue
    Fsis
    Gary Herbert
    Gary King
    Gary-king
    Genetic Viability
    Giving Tuesday
    GnRH
    GonaCon
    Grazing Improvement Act
    Grazing Permits
    Horse Abuse
    Horse-abuse
    Horse Care
    Horse-care
    Horse Carriages
    Horsemeat
    Horse Protection Act
    Horse-protection-act
    Horse Racing
    Horse-racing
    Horseracing Integrity And Safety Act
    Horseracing-integrity-and-safety-act
    Horse Rescue
    Horse-rescue
    Horses
    Horses For Life Foundation
    Horse Slaughter
    Horse-slaughter
    Horse Soring
    Horse Transport
    Horse-transport
    Horse Transportation Safety Act
    Horse-transportation-safety-act
    Horse Tripping
    Hr 1518
    Hr 1518ac88d1315d
    H.R. 1942
    H.R. 5058
    HSUS
    Humane Methods Of Slaughter Act
    Humane Society International
    Humboldt
    International Equine Business Association
    Iowa
    Iron-county
    Jan Schakowsky
    Jan-schakowsky
    Jay-nixon
    Jim Moran
    Jim-moran
    Joan Guilfoyle
    Joanna Swabe
    John Barrasso
    Johnnie HMA
    Kansas
    Karen Budd-Falen
    Keaton Walker
    Ken Salazar
    King Amendment
    Ld 12861fa1b5a140
    Leonard Blach
    Lester Friedlander
    Livestock
    Maine
    Mary Fallin
    Mary Landrieu
    Mary-landrieu
    Matt Mead
    Mexico
    Michelle Lujan Grisham
    Michelle-lujan-grisham
    Mike Fitzpatrick
    Missouri
    Moran Young Amendment
    Moran-young-amendment
    Moranyoung Amendment670e4071a7
    Mowdy Ranch
    NACO
    National Academy Of Sciences
    National Day Of The Horse
    National Residue Program
    Navajo Nation
    Navajo-nation
    Neil Kornze
    NEPA
    Nevada
    New Mexico
    New-mexico
    New Mexico Equine Rescue Alliance
    Nicholas Dodman
    Nm
    North-carolina
    Oklahoma
    Ottb
    Past Act
    Past-act
    Patricia M. Fazio
    Patrick Meehan
    Patrick-meehan
    PEER
    Phenylbutazon
    Platero Project
    Porcine Zona Pelucida
    Princess Anne
    Public Lands
    PZP
    Rains Natural Meats
    Rains-natural-meats
    Raul Grijalva
    Responsible Transportation
    Richard-burr
    Rick De Los Santos
    Rick-de-los-santos
    Roly Owers
    Rosa DeLauro
    Roswell
    Roy Blunt
    Roy-blunt
    Ryoichi Okubo
    SAFE Act
    SAFE Act
    Sage Grouse
    Sally Jewell
    Sally Jewell
    Science And Conservation Center
    Sooner Poll
    Soring
    SpayVac
    Sterilization
    Steve King
    Susana Martinez
    Susana-martinez
    Taylor Grazing Act
    Theodore Roosevelt National Park
    Theresa-vincent
    Tom Davis
    Tom Gorey
    Tom Gorey
    Tom Udall
    Tom-udall
    Tom Vilsack
    Tom Vilsack
    Tribal Lands
    Tribal-lands
    Us Court Of Appealsd83cbed7a8
    USDA
    Us Fish And Wildlife Service86af631d0b
    Us Forest Service367fe28759
    USGS
    Utah
    Valley Meat
    Valley-meat
    Vern Buchanan
    Walking Horses
    Walking-horses
    Walter-b-jones
    Welfare Ranchers
    Western-watersheds-project
    Wild Horse Education
    Wild Horse Oversight Act
    Wild Horses
    Wild-horses
    World-horse-welfare
    Wyoming
    Yakama Nation
    Yakama-nation

© 2012—​2019 This website and its content is copyright of ​Horses For Life Foundation. All rights reserved.